Request our free team month

For housing associations

The policy says no. What does the lease say?

LEASE-iQ® helps homeownership, repairs, property and legal teams interpret leases consistently across a portfolio. It keeps the signed wording and current sources beside each live repair, consent or service-charge case.

Prepare my question Watch the policy-and-lease example · 2½ minutes →

The film uses Adam’s real Hafer Road lease and a clearly labelled illustrative policy. It demonstrates the checking process; the sample wording is not Eastlight’s policy.

A real LEASE-iQ screen showing an answer beside its cited lease page

Your next step

Give the next team an answer they can check.

Start with one resident enquiry. Keep the lease, policy, evidence and intended outcome distinct.

Describe your problem →Need an account? Request access →See how to log in, upload and ask →

Housing-association team

Eastlight checks the interpretation against the lease reference.

“Our Leasehold Services Team have been using this to interrogate leases to assist with sales enquiries and composing letters to leaseholders or shared owners about details from their leases and it has been incredibly helpful - it references back to the part of the lease it refers to, so we are able to do human checks to ensure its interpreting correctly.”

Leasehold Services Team, Eastlight Community Homes

“At Eastlight, we're always interested in exploring new ways of working that help us deliver a better service for customers and make the best use of our colleagues' time. LEASE-iQ has helped our teams access lease information more efficiently, while maintaining the human oversight and professional judgement that remain essential to good customer outcomes.”

Charlotte Todd, Chief Property Officer, Eastlight Community Homes Limited

Read Eastlight’s case study and 13 use cases →

Request a free team month

Where the time goes

The questions that need a consistent answer across schemes, teams and leases written in different eras.

Find the document, obligation and missing information holding up the answer.

Open the detail 02Repairs arguments

Open the repairing covenant before policy and memory take over.

Open the detail 03Consent requests

Check whether consent is required, who gives it and what conditions apply.

Open the detail 04Service-charge questions

Separate the lease route from the demand paperwork and supporting evidence.

Open the detail

An Eastlight example · one connected issue

A repair, a policy and a resident waiting for an answer.

The colleague’s understanding of the policy appeared to differ from the lease. Work through the repair responsibility, cost recovery and allowance separately, then bring the checked findings into one response.

Ask one question at a time. These are suggested prompts based on an anonymised customer use case. Adapt the facts to your own lease.

01 Who should arrange the repair?

Read the repair promise with the definitions and exceptions.

Question to copy into LEASE-iQ

We are the housing association. A shared owner has reported damaged guttering. Under this selected lease, who is responsible for repairing it? Show the exact clause and page, explain any conditions, and identify what facts are still missing. Do not assume our role from the filename.

02 Can we charge the cost back?

Check the charging words separately from the duty to repair.

Question to copy into LEASE-iQ

For the guttering repair we have just discussed, does this lease allow us to recover the cost from the shared owner? Show the exact charging wording and its conditions, and any relevant law. If the documents or facts do not establish the answer, say what is missing.

03 Does the repairs allowance apply?

Check the initial repair period, dates, eligible work and any limits.

Question to copy into LEASE-iQ

Does this lease provide an initial repair period or a repairs allowance that could apply to this guttering repair? Show the wording, conditions and any dates or limits. Do not assume the resident is eligible or that the repair qualifies.

04 How does the policy compare?

Supply the actual policy passage; a colleague’s description is context to check.

Question to copy into LEASE-iQ

Compare the checked lease findings with this policy wording: [paste the relevant policy passage]. Identify any apparent difference affecting this guttering repair and explain what needs checking before we rely on the policy. Do not treat the policy as changing the lease.

05 Prepare the next response

Bring the checked findings together, then review the draft before sending.

Question to copy into LEASE-iQ

Using only the findings and facts we have checked in this conversation, draft a short reply to the shared owner about the guttering repair. Explain the current repair, cost and allowance position in plain English. Keep missing facts and undecided points explicit. Do not invent an appointment, promised payment or response date. Retain the source references in a separate case note for your own verification.

The useful outcome

A case note you can verify and act on: who arranges the work, what supports the cost and allowance position, what remains unknown, and the next action for the resident.

Read the Eastlight case study and other complex examples →

Eastlight’s example records an investigation into a possible policy mismatch. It does not establish that the policy was wrong or that the case was resolved. Confirming several questions together will be demonstrated once that feature is live and tested.

The handoff, before and after

Give the first person a source they can show the second.

Who is responsible for this repair?

Before

Homeownership
Repairs
Legal
Managing agent
Resident emails

An answer you can verify and use

01Signed lease
02Relevant wording
03Evidence still needed
04Focused escalation

A clearer first pass

Keep the source with the case as it moves.

Difficult cases still need the right legal and professional input. A better first pass gives that person the lease, the question and the missing evidence in one place.

01
Use the signed document
Start with the lease and the real question, not a generic policy answer.
02
Separate the layers
Keep the lease, current law and missing evidence distinct.
03
Keep the source open
Give the next person the clause, page and point that still needs judgment.

The result

A checked position that repairs, homeownership and finance can use.

Bring the repair duty, charging position and allowance conditions into one case note. Keep the source beside each finding, identify what is still missing, and give the resident a clear next step.

Use it on live work

Use the case that keeps coming back.

Choose one resale, repair, consent or service-charge question. Check whether the first person can find the clause and show the next person exactly what still needs judgment.

See how LEASE-iQ works

Independent help

LEASE offers free, independent leasehold guidance.

building trust is not the only route. The Leasehold Advisory Service publishes guidance and offers appointments for leaseholders and park-home owners.

One team. One month. No cost.

Use up to 100 leases and ask the questions already arriving.

This is not a product tour or a separate workflow. After a 30-minute setup, the team uses LEASE-iQ for live work throughout the month. Add up to 100 leases and ask as many genuine work questions as the team needs.

Request our free team monthNo card. No automatic conversion. The team agrees what to measure before it starts.

01Set up the team in 30 minutes.

02Use up to 100 leases in the normal workflow.

03Review use and value together for 30 minutes each week.

Download and pass it on

A LEASE-iQ briefing for housing-association teams

Share the team workflow, source standard and manual one-month access route.

Download the PDF